Spoiler Comics Book Reviews: Auteur Theory

Suddenly/ Meanwhile...Jun14 TagsAzzarellobleeding coolbob harrasBrian WoodCameron StewartCatwomanDC ComicsDMZGail SimoneGrant MorrisonJeff LemireNathan EdmondsonRebootScott SnyderRelated PostsGrant Morrison Gives His Perspective on the DC Comics RebootBatman Arkham City #2Flashpoint #2Simone on Batgirl #1Share This

Posted by Peter DeCourcy on Jun 14, 2011 in Suddenly/ Meanwhile... | 5 comments

Beautiful cover by Cliff Chiang

So the DC Comic Solicits were released yesterday to a big underwhelming thud.

It’s not that there weren’t any interesting ideas shown; see the wonderful solicit for Wonder Woman. It’s just I’m underwhelmed with a sense of not caring. I think my main problem is, for the most part I’m only seeing four – maybe five writers whose voices I feel are incredibly unique.

Back in film school, we learned about ‘’ – which as Wikipedia puts it: “ holds that a director’s film reflects the director’s personal creative vision, as if they were the primary “auteur” (the French word for “author”). In spite of—and sometimes even because of—the production of the film as part of an industrial process, the author’s creative voice is distinct enough to shine through all kinds of studio interference and through the collective process.”

Morrison, Lemire, Snyder, Simone and Azzarello. These are people who I feel are Auteurs in comics.

I’m not saying that the rest are terrible writers…what I’ve read of Kyle Higgens has been pretty fantastic and Peter Milligan is one of my favourite writers when he’s on. It’s just a lot of the writers presented seem to be basic journey men. People who are presented with a status quo maintain and story beats to accomplish. Obviously I don’t know that this is the way it’s going to be, but it sure does feel that way.

There’s a story out there about how when Marvel was looking to start up the Ultimate comic line, Bill Jemas was looking for suggestions on who should start-up the line:

When Bill Jemas asked Bob [Harras then Marvel EIC now DC EIC] to suggest some cutting-edge comics talent for the Ultimate line, Bob suggested Scott Lobdell, Adam Pollina and Joe Harris. I understand [Joe] Quesada recommended Brian Bendis to Bill Jemas – then the likes of Mark Millar, Garth Ennis and Grant Morrison.

Welcome to the 1990s.

In 1999 Bendis, Millar, Ennis and Morrison were unique voices in comics. They were Auteurs of the comic book set.

I don’t really see any a lot of that when it comes to DC’s relaunch.

I’ve gone on record before about not really ‘getting’ Geoff Johns. I think that probably has more to do with not connecting with the same comic book era. Johns only wants to write the heroes he grew up reading, which is understandable, but I feel that it’s a comic book creators duty to build rather than scale back.

Every single character revamp that’s come out so far has seemed really…90s. That’s really the only way to describe it. I don’t have much attachment to most DC Characters outside of Batman and late additions like The New Gods (and cast offs) – but a lot of the choices DC seems to be making kind of harkens towards being ‘what people think kids think is cool’ rather than good and genuinely exciting ideas.

I think if DC really wanted to make a big splash, they’d have looked at more writers like Cullen Bunn, Kathryn Immonen, Matt Kindt or Nathan Edmondson whose ‘Who is Jake Ellis?’ is currently one of the most interesting high concept books on the market. It’s great that he’s writing Grifter, but I’d much rather have his voice on Detective rather than Tony Daniels’ who seems content to retread minor plot points from better stories – which of course kind of seems like DC’s MO for the last few years anyway.

I have a feeling that a year from now they’ll be another event that ends with the old universe and the new DCU being split into two worlds – giving us a Ultimate-esque Earth 2 line…

On other DC is missing the point news: the new Catwoman solicit is arguably one of the worst things I’ve ever read.

Look, I really like March's art.. but she's getting a pearl necklace here.. isn't she?

Meet Catwoman. She’s addicted to the night. Addicted to shiny objects. Addicted to Batman. Most of all, Catwoman is addicted to danger. She can’t help herself, and the truth is – she doesn’t want to. She’s good at being bad, and very bad at being good.

It reeks of sexism and completely misses the point on the character. If you haven’t read Darwyn Cooke/Ed Brubaker/Cameron Stewart’s revamp on Catwoman a few years back, you’re doing yourself a severe injustice. It’s not only one of the best crime series ever written, it also made Selina Kyle the most interesting female character in the DCU. Editor’s note: unfortunately they’re all out of print. For shame DC.

The solicit sounds like a bad caption on a 1950s B-Movie than anything representative of the character growth she experienced during that time. Is it too late for Winnick and Joshua Hale Fialkov to do a switcheroo? Hell, Cameron Stewart has proved his writing chops and definitely has an affinity for the character – why not bring him on?

And finally…to end on some good news. Brian Wood, writer of such amazing series as Northlanders, The Tourist and DMZ has put up a free download of the entire 132-page Public Domain 2 artbook. It’s about 115 megs, nicely high res, and has beautiful art – especially for those of you who, like me, like drawings of architecture.

Pete DeCourcy tumbls over at Grown Up Boy Detective and writes for The Simple Art of Crime. If you have any questions or demands of him he can be reached via comment below.

Share this:ShareRedditEmail 5 Comments

Jun14Chris Howard

I really enjoyed the ‘hero’ Catwoman and wish those books were in print, or we could get a nice thick collection. That was some great development of a character. And Gotham Sirens was one of the books I’d just bought the first trade of. Guess I’ll toss it now.

I like Cliff’s art, hope to see more of it, but don’t know that I’d start reading Wonder Woman for it. I did buy the Perez run way back…

Jun14Kevin Boyd

I agree that now would have been a good time to bring on board fresh writers with new ideas to shake things up. I have faith that some writers (Snyder, Lemire) will hopefully bring something new to the DCU, but DC seriously lacks in visionary or ‘big picture’ authors and that’s what hurts this relaunch severely. Shuffling creators around the board like chess pieces does not create fresh, new and exciting directions…
When I look at the DCU books in September I still get an overall feeling of ‘meh’ as well. The only book that I think will be even remotely challenging on any level will be Grant Morrison and Rags Morales’ ACTION COMICS, reportedly featuring an angry young activist Superman. Shame about the Jim Lee costume though.

Jun14Ed Campbell

The description for Catwoman reads like a Russ Meyer movie “Faster Catwoman! Kill! Kill!”.

It just sounds like they want to reboot, but just don’t understand what the character has become.

I agree with you Pete, this new universe will split and it will be Ultimate DC and the original continuity. As Brent said “Un-Crisis”.

Jun14Peter DeCourcy

I really wish they just got a whole whack of the best and brightest writers in comics and asked them point blank – how can we streamlined our best characters and bring them into a new age?

Jun14Ryan P

They probably should have just continued the All Star line and made that their Ultimate Universe. I like DC, as I’m sure a few of you know the majority of my purchases month to month are DC books BUT I have a bad feeling about this. I wasn’t happy when Marvel did the whole One more day / Brand New Day thing to Spider-Man but I gave it a chance and it took them a while but the stories have turned out to good. They probably could have written most of them without ending the marriage but thats a whole different discussion. I will give the books I’m currently reading a chance, I might even pick up one or two others BUT they better make them good or this could be a really good jumping OFF point for me.

Reply Leave a Comment Click here to cancel reply.

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website